House kn / Kochi Architect’s Studio

first_img “COPY” “COPY” CopySave this picture!© Nobumitsu WatanabeText description provided by the architects. A residence in Kanagawa Prefecture Japan. The scenery of the residential quarter in suburbs where the detached house with the garden lines up has extended. At first, I put a big box whole of the site, then make big void as a window.Save this picture!© Nobumitsu WatanabeThe relation “Garden and house” is improved to”The big box including the garden and environment around the site” in the scale. The box makes a big window on environment is chosen, sky in the south and green tract of land in the north. This is trial for urban residence to close and open to the environment. It enable to feel more large scale.Save this picture!SectionProject gallerySee allShow lessagriCultural Mountain Winning Proposal / Group IUTArticles’Hong Kong at 15: Redefining the Public Realm’ ExhibitionArticles Share Projects ShareFacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappMailOrhttps://www.archdaily.com/301256/house-kn-kochi-architects-studio Clipboard Japan Architects: Kochi Architect’s Studio Area Area of this architecture project Photographs:  Nobumitsu Watanabe, Kazuyatsu Kochi+ 14 Share House kn / Kochi Architect’s Studio 2006center_img Area:  223 m² Year Completion year of this architecture project Photographs Year:  ArchDaily Houses ShareFacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappMailOrhttps://www.archdaily.com/301256/house-kn-kochi-architects-studio Clipboard House kn / Kochi Architect’s StudioSave this projectSaveHouse kn / Kochi Architect’s StudioSave this picture!© Nobumitsu WatanabeHouses•Miura-shi, Japan CopyAbout this officeKochi Architect’s StudioOfficeFollowProductConcrete#TagsProjectsBuilt ProjectsSelected ProjectsResidential ArchitectureHousesMiura-shiHousesJapanPublished on December 09, 2012Cite: “House kn / Kochi Architect’s Studio” 09 Dec 2012. ArchDaily. Accessed 11 Jun 2021. ISSN 0719-8884Read commentsBrowse the CatalogLouvers / ShuttersTechnowoodSunshade SystemsRailing / BalustradesMitrexIntegrated Photovoltaic Railing – BIPV RailingMetal PanelsAurubisCopper Alloy: Nordic BrassWindowsVitrocsaMinimalist Window – GuillotineGlassLAMILUXGlass Roof PR60 PassivhausSinksBradley Corporation USASinks – Verge LVG-SeriesSealantsSikaConstruction Solutions in Stavros FoundationShower TraysAcquabellaShower Tray – Focus BetonPatios / TerracesFranken-SchotterPatios and TerracesCeramicsTerrealTerracotta cladding in Le TrèfleSkylightsFAKROWooden pivot roof windows FYP-V proSkySynthetics / AsphaltFirestone Building ProductsRoofing System – RubberGard EPDMMore products »Read commentsSave想阅读文章的中文版本吗?House kn / Kochi Architect’s Studio是否翻译成中文现有为你所在地区特制的网站?想浏览ArchDaily中国吗?Take me there »✖You’ve started following your first account!Did you know?You’ll now receive updates based on what you follow! Personalize your stream and start following your favorite authors, offices and users.Go to my streamlast_img read more

Read More »

Guidelines Needed To Ensure Ethical Treatment Of Animals Even If They Are Raised For Human Consumption: Madras High Court

first_imgNews UpdatesGuidelines Needed To Ensure Ethical Treatment Of Animals Even If They Are Raised For Human Consumption: Madras High Court Sparsh Upadhyay13 Feb 2021 6:05 AMShare This – xThe carrying of chicken, the most common source of animal protein these days, must also be covered. Guidelines need to be laid out to ensure more ethical treatment of animals, even if they are raised for the purpose of human consumption: Madras High CourtIn a plea complaining of the cruel manner in which cattle is transported to slaughterhouses, the Madras High Court on Monday (08th February) directed the State Government to file its counter-affidavit within six weeks. During the course of the hearing, the Bench of Justice Chief Justice Sanjib Banerjee and Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy observed, “The matter is of some concern…Your free access to Live Law has expiredTo read the article, get a premium account.Your Subscription Supports Independent JournalismSubscription starts from ₹ 599+GST (For 6 Months)View PlansPremium account gives you:Unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments.Reading experience of Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.Subscribe NowAlready a subscriber?LoginIn a plea complaining of the cruel manner in which cattle is transported to slaughterhouses, the Madras High Court on Monday (08th February) directed the State Government to file its counter-affidavit within six weeks. During the course of the hearing, the Bench of Justice Chief Justice Sanjib Banerjee and Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy observed, “The matter is of some concern not only because it pertains to cattle, but because the present petitioner draws the Court’s attention to animals which are slaughtered for human consumption or used in industry or the like.” Further, the State Government was directed to file its counter-affidavit within six weeks, dealing not only with the transportation of cattle, but also the transportation of goat and sheep and lamb in addition. Importantly, the Court also said, “The carrying of chicken, the most common source of animal protein these days, must also be covered. Guidelines need to be laid out to ensure a more ethical treatment of animals, even if they are raised for the purpose of human consumption.” Thereafter, the matter was listed for further hearing on 05th April 2021. About the Plea One V S K Tamilselvan of Erode filed the plea before the Court stating that illegal transportation of cattle is rampant in the state, particularly from one district to another. It was also alleged that such transportation of cattle is in complete violation of the provisions of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animal Act, 1960. It was also submitted that despite the enactment of several rules and regulations, which provide for proper treatment of cattle, particularly cows, which are transported to slaughterhouses, no such regulations are followed. Related news The Karnataka High Court recently set aside an order of the Magistrate court handing over custody of ten dogs given to their owner who treated them with cruelty. A single bench of Justice H P Sandesh, set aside the order of the magistrate court which restored the animals to the man accused of cruelty and handed over the dogs to an NGO, Compassion Unlimited Plus Action, which expressed a willingness to take care of them. Right to live in a healthy and clean atmosphere and right to get protection from human beings against inflicting unnecessary pain or suffering is a right guaranteed to the animals under Section 3 and Section 11 of the PCA Act read with Article 51- A(g) and (h) of the Constitution of India”, the Court observed. Also, noting that animals, like the human beings have the capability of comprehending the physical and mental pain and that they do feel the severity of the physical harm inflicted on them, the Gujarat High Court last month denied bail to a man accused of various offences punishable under The Prevention of Animal Cruelty Act. The Bench of Justice Bela M. Trivedi further observed that the Prevention of Animal Cruelty Act and the Animal Preservation Act have been enacted to punish severely the persons indulged in inflicting cruelty to the animals. Click Here To Download OrderRead OrderSubscribe to LiveLaw, enjoy Ad free version and other unlimited features, just INR 599 Click here to Subscribe. All payment options available.loading….Next Storylast_img read more

Read More »